Chief Justice of India-designate Dr Justice Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud has been a part of many landmark verdicts, throughout his six-year tenure as a Supreme Court docket choose. With sound information of regulation and the Structure, he has given verdicts redefining the Indian judiciary. A number of the most outstanding verdicts by the CJI-designate are:
Everlasting fee for girls in armed forces
A Bench led by Dr Justice DY Chandrachud broke the glass ceiling by enabling girls officers within the Indian Military to get everlasting fee and command postings in February 2020. The Apex Court docket rejected the Centre’s stance on their bodily limitations, which was primarily based on gender efficiency and different stereotypes that discriminated towards girls.
One other Bench headed by him later delivered an identical verdict for girls within the Indian Navy, allowing them a everlasting fee as effectively.
Proper to Privateness as a basic proper
On August 24, 2017, a nine-judge Structure Bench, headed by Justice Chandrachud, unanimously held that the correct to privateness needs to be assured as a basic proper below the Structure. The order was handed on a writ petition filed by Justice KS Puttaswamy, a retired choose of the Excessive Court docket, difficult the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar scheme launched by the UPA Authorities.
Decriminalisation of Part 377 below the Indian Penal Code
On September 6, 2018, the five-Decide Bench led by then Chief Justice of India and in addition comprising Justice Rohinton Nariman, Justice DY Chandrachud, Justice AM Khanwilkar and Justice Indu Malhotra partially struck down Part 377 of the Indian Penal Code, decriminalising same-sex relations between consenting adults on the grounds that it discriminated towards people on the idea of their sexual orientation and gender id, thus violating Articles 14 and 15 of the Structure.
The Apex Court docket, nevertheless, upheld the provisions in Part 377 that criminalised non-consensual acts or sexual acts carried out on animals.
Granting abortion rights to single girls, transgenders
The Supreme Court docket bench headed by Justice Chandrachud prolonged the advantages of the Medical Termination of Being pregnant Act, 1971 (MTP Act) to single girls and transgenders on September 29 this 12 months.
The decision was delivered on the Worldwide Secure Abortion Day, with the Bench noting that the regulation mustn’t determine the beneficiaries of a statute primarily based on slender patriarchal rules about what constitutes permissible intercourse as it will create invidious classifications.
Placing down Part 497 of the Indian Penal Code
A five-Decide Bench, comprising then Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice RF Nariman, Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice Indu Malhotra termed Part 497 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) as unconstitutional on the grounds that it was parochial, arbitrary and violated the correct to equality and privateness.
Entry of ladies in Sabarimala temple
A five-judge Structure Bench of then CJI Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Rohinton Nariman, Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Indu Malhotra permitted girls of menstruating age to enter Sabarimala temple in September 2018, observing that each one Hindu pilgrims, no matter gender, have been permitted to enter the temple.
Any exception positioned on girls due to organic variations violated the Proper to Equality below Article 14 and the Proper to Freedom of Faith below Article 25 of the Structure, the Court docket had held.
The Ayodhya verdict
The five-Decide Structure Bench, led by the then Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, and comprising Justice SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Abdul S Nazeer, introduced down the curtains on November 9, 2019 on the 161-year-old case, by clearing the trail for the development of a Ram Temple on the Ayodhya website. The Apex Court docket had additional directed the Central authorities to allot 5 acres to the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board for constructing a mosque.
Giving recognition to dwelling will of terminally-ill sufferers for passive euthanasia
A five-judge bench comprising the then CJI Dipak Misra, Justice AK Sikri, Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Ashok Bhushan delivered a verdict on March 9, 2018, recognising the ‘dwelling will’ made by terminally-ill sufferers for passive euthanasia.
Razing of Supertech’s Twin Towers
On August 31, 2021, a Bench headed by Justice Chandrachud had upheld the Allahabad Excessive Court docket order, giving its nod to the demolition of the dual towers by real-estate main Supertech on the grounds that the 40-storey buildings positioned in Noida have been constructed illegally, and violated constructing norms.